QAITQAIT
Corrected Sep 30, 2026 · View changes and evidence
Evidence Summary
Contract safety: Caution (71/100) — the contract is broadly sound but has admin powers or gaps worth reviewing. Adoption & liquidity: Untraded (22/100) — it is effectively untraded, with very thin liquidity. These are separate reads: a sound contract can still be early/thinly traded, and a widely-held token can still carry admin powers. Key points: Very low liquidity — high exit slippage. This is an automated snapshot, not a professional audit. Evidence correction (2026-09-30): The retained-admin score adjustment does not establish that the controller is an EOA. Original scores and snapshot date retained; no new scan was performed.
Automated analysis from structured provider data. Not a substitute for a professional audit.
Two-Axis Risk
Caution · Untraded
Observed contract signals warrant review; unknown permissions are not treated as absent.
Observed market signals show little or no trading liquidity.
Provider Contract Metadata
Explorer or contract-security provider status; this snapshot does not identify the source for this field. Sentinel does not independently rebuild source and compare deployed bytecode.
Contract Permissions
Provider Holder Evidence
Concentration uses a provider-reported holder sample, not a complete census. Providers may exclude contract, locked, or burn addresses; this snapshot does not identify the provider for each field.
Observed Pool Liquidity
Pool totals, DEX, and age use same-chain DexScreener results; not an exhaustive market view. Tax and honeypot fields use available GoPlus evidence.
Observed Pool Composition
Reserve details for pools returned by DexScreener; not an exhaustive pool inventory.
29.0K QAIT · 96 USDT
Score Breakdown
Contract Safety
Adoption / Liquidity
The current formula reproduces this stored legacy overall: 65% Contract Safety and 35% Adoption / Liquidity, capped at Contract Safety + 8, with a 70-point floor for Safe contracts. The snapshot does not record its formula version. The two axis results above are the primary assessment. Rows are stored evidence adjustments before axis calibration; they do not add directly to the baseline.
Correction recorded Sep 30, 2026 · evidence and changes
Original snapshot: Sep 18, 2026. This is a bounded factual correction; no new full scan or code audit was performed.
Safety 71 → 71; Adoption 22 → 22; legacy overall 54 → 54.
- Removed the unsupported single-EOA description. The historical code-check receipt and observation block were not retained. The existing adjustment reflects retained admin control and does not establish the controller type, signer independence or number of people in control. No governance bonus is inferred.
Token name and symbol screening
Name and symbol screening-provider data was unavailable when this scan ran. This check does not identify project leadership or evaluate its reputation.
Checked Sep 18, 2026
Run Full AI Audit — $99
Get a 14-section professional audit report with detailed vulnerability analysis, remediation steps, and a downloadable PDF.
Monitor This Token
Continuous monitoring with alerts for ownership changes, liquidity drops, and risk score changes. Coming soon.
This analysis is generated using automated scanning and AI interpretation. It is not a substitute for a manual security audit by qualified auditors. Firepan Sentinel does not guarantee the safety of any token or contract.